RON PAUL’S DECEPTION EXPOSED
RoN PauL’S DeCePTioN eXPoSeD
RE: RON PAUL INQUIRY
From: Eric Phelps (email@example.com)
Dear [NAME REMOVED],
I am forwarding another post on Ron Paul after this post.
—– Original Message —–
From: [NAME REMOVED]
Cc: [NAME REMOVED]
Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2008 11:50 AM
Subject: Ron Paul Inquiry
Dear Brother Eric,
It’s been a couple of weeks since you replied to my inquiry about
Ron Paul. I was hoping we might pick up the thread… I studied
your responses, did a little more digging myself, and here’s where
I’m at just now. I follow the order of your earlier comments:
•My search came up dry for Ron Paul’s letter of praise to Rome and the
papacy; however, a search led to Arctic Beacon and a piece that
covers Paul’s habit of consistently side-stepping questions when the
Vatican or related subjects come up… I’m not sure this should
necessarily lead to any conclusions about motive just now.
Disagreed. The letter from Paul openly praises the Pope calling
him a man of God.
TO VIEW THIS LETTER (” Honoring Pope John Paul II: A Consistent Pro-Life Figure”by Rep. Ron Paul, MD) GO TO:
•Regarding to his association with Jesse Helms, by the same logic—that
being, his role as a politician—I again assume for the moment that he may
have had reasons for keeping the lines of communication open with Helms.
Helms is a 33rd Degree Freemason which Paul never reveals. Paul
has played the game in Washington for years which no honest man
would do. An honest man would openly expose it all
as in Mr. Smith Goes to Washington.
•The gold commission-I looked up Paul & Lehrman’s Gold Commission
Report of 7/1/82 and dowloaded it in .pdf format, but I don’t have the time to
wade into 230+ pages just now (I’m a slow reader). From the preface and
intro it seems that Dr. Paul is a staunch advocate for a gold standard, in which
I find no fault, but I will hazard a guess (from my one of your lectures) and
say your concern must be that he does not advocate a bi-metal standard?
Is it possible he simply has overlooked the value of bi-metallism?
No. I think he advocates the gold standard as a stepping stone to
restoring Gold and Silver coin. But he is addressing symptoms,
not the source of the disease—and he knows it. He has
lectured at the Jesuit Order’s Georgetown University just
two days ago. He knows the Georgetown/CFR connection
yet remains mute.
•I visit Lew Rockwell’s site occasionally, and have not noted anything in
the articles there that struck me as questionable… Could you give me
an example of “disinfo” to help sharpen perceptions of this guy?
Rockwell addresses symptoms also. Never does he address
the power of the Vatican in political affairs, past or present. This
should be common knowledge to any legitimate investigative
•Could Ron Paul have been in the Reagan administration for benign
reasons? perhaps for a belief that it’s better to work from the inside?
Never. Reagan was surrounded by Knights of Malta in his
administration. Paul was there when Reagan acknowleged the
Sovereign State of Vatican City yet never made an outcry.
Paul knows the Vatican killed JFK, yet is silent on the topic.
•That he knows the CFR’s role in the U.S. is no surprise; I infer nothing
from his keeping quiet on this point other than what you said about
his silence being a political tactic…
Paul knows the CFR runs the US government. He also knows that
911 was an inside job. He also knows that CFR/Grover Newt
Gingrich has said that anybody who believes that 911 was an
inside job is “out of their mind.” This would put Paul in the hot
seat—a place he does not wish to go.
•I see why you characterize him as a “political thermostat.” Perhaps,
as Rense suggested recently, he has a more ominous role as a “bird-dog,”
sent to draw out loyal supporters of the constitution?
Remembering that Rense is another Jesuit Temporal Coadjutor,
no doubt that the Paul campaign is an outing of real patriots
so they can be identified for the coming roundups for the
concentration camps now admitted to exist by the San
To all these points I would add:
•A short YouTube clip shows Dr. Paul just as he is about to step into
a limo. Someone calls to him from off-camera; he glances up and
quickly flashes that 1st and 4th finger “horns” salute the NWO types use.
Now, it’s hard to imagine that if he’s a NWO stealth candidate that he
would ever allow himself to be caught by such a careless breach… so
might he have been reacting impulsively and without knowing the
meaning of that gesture?
(”Ron Paul & “the Horned Hand”") &
(”Ron Paul, J.B.S., Catholicism, Reagan”)
FOR MORE INCRIMINATING EVIDENCE ON RON PAUL]
He was sending a message, I’m sure. If Paul was really an enemy
of the Order’s CFR controlled US government, he would have
received the Paul Wellstone or Larry McDonald treatment years ago.
•Less ambiguously and more ominously, his official website, RonPaul2008.com,
recently announced Dr. Paul sponsors new legislation, of which he says:
“My legislation, entitled The Marque and Reprisal Act of 2007 (HR 3216),
makes the surgical strike option available to the President in our
mission to capture Bin Laden… it is high time ALL constitutional
tools were utilized in the hunt for this dangerous madman…”
Does this not expose Paul for the fake that he is?
•I do find this very troubling:
(1) He has been proclaimed from the start that we need to disengage from
our many foreign “entanglements” in line with the view of our founding
Fathers, yet now he egregiously contradicts himself. And by this new
measure he gives an already out of control Executive still more power
to “ramp-up” hostilities in the Middle East. Wouldn’t Pike be pleased?
By his statement quoted above, Paul believes that 911 was done by
Bin Laden; that Bin Laden is still alive and not dead; and that this
Crusade is justified which includes approval of surgical strikes
in Iraq and Afghanistan. Further, Paul is repeating the mantra of
the pope’s preachers of this ungodly Crusade against the Shia.
(2) His act gives tacit approval to the War on Terror mythology, and
underscored his position by denouncing the idea that 9/11 truth could
be anything but the official version.
(3) Shortly before her recent assassination in Pakistan, Benazir Bhutto
sat for an interview with David Frost—BBC I think.
While engaged in an
unrelated line of thought, she casually mentioned an operation in which
a certain man had taken part; then, (quite innocently I thought) she noted
that same man was the one who had killed Bin Laden in late 2001 or
early 2002 (can’t recall). I think it’s on YouTube.
Agreed. Bin Laden has been dead for years. Even Ann Coulter admits
to this fact.
•Then there’s this: In several of his speeches and debates, while decrying
the folly of our Iraq entanglement, Dr. Paul has noted pointedly, and with no
apparent reason given the context, that we are building an embassy in
Baghdad that’s “bigger than the Vatican.” That seemed calculated to go
over the heads of all but the most informed… But to whom? And what purpose?
Good question. He appeared to be anti-Vatican at that moment.
This was a calculated deception and gained popularity among the
anti-Vatican backers. Paul is playing politics as he has done for
the last twenty years.
For the moment, anyway, I can’t perceive a “smoking gun” yet that would
fully discredit him. To me he seems an enigma. I’m reluctant to form any
judgments just yet. It seems he’s either very evil, or remarkably shrewd.
He is both. No honest man is an enigma. Transparency is the key to
dectecting a man’s honesty—who he really is. The honest man tells
the same story every time he opens his mouth no matter where he is.
Any further insight you might offer would be greatly appreciated, because
if he turns out to be bad, then for whom does one vote?
I vote for no one on a federal level. I participate in State government
and State issues. I advocate State secession and the resumption of
sovereignty for the once Great Protestant Commonwealth of
Pennsylvania. Secession is the only political answer.
Meanwhile, I’ve been trying to gain a better grasp on another matter: My
earlier question about your VA III e-book was inspired by the idea that most
of the 500,000+ Ron Paul supporters, and all others, for that matter, need to better understand what’s really going on.
Agreed. They know nothing and are being used to further the fascist agenda.
Notice that most of the Paul supporters are White, and will man
the pope’s White fascist DHS and Blackwater once the next terrorist
My contact with many of them via the
DailyPaul.com web-log suggests their enthusiasm is genuine, their will to give
and sacrifice is real, but they are still in may ways, child-like. Any statement,
any question you may ask better resonate with their “rah rah rah, go team go”
camaraderie, or your are likely to be excoriated and labeled a “troll,” which
I means a “subversive” or disinfo artist, near as i can tell.
Agreed. They almost have a nazi mentality. This is because they
are desperate and know this government cannot continue
on its present course much longer. This was the same political
atmosphere that brought Hitler to power after the wicked Versailles
Treaty and economic collapse in 1921.
All in all, it seems
many of them are far from understanding. I’ve been thinking about how to call
attention to your research in a way that piques interest rather than raises ire.
That will be difficult, but an honest goal.
Sincerely in faith,