Short article on Ron Paul's Deception Exposed

RON PAUL’S DECEPTION EXPOSED RoN PauL’S DeCePTioN eXPoSeD RE: RON PAUL INQUIRY From: Eric Phelps (eric@vaticanassassins.org) Dear [NAME REMOVED], I am forwarding another post on Ron Paul after this post. —– Original Message —– From: [NAME REMOVED] To: eric@vaticanassassins.org Cc: [NAME REMOVED] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2008 11:50 AM Subject: Ron Paul Inquiry Dear Brother Eric, It’s been a couple of weeks since you replied to my inquiry about Ron Paul. I was hoping we might pick up the thread… I studied your responses, did a little more digging myself, and here’s where I’m at just now. I follow the order of your earlier comments: •My search came up dry for Ron Paul’s letter of praise to Rome and the papacy; however, a search led to Arctic Beacon and a piece that covers Paul’s habit of consistently side-stepping questions when the Vatican or related subjects come up… I’m not sure this should necessarily lead to any conclusions about motive just now. Disagreed. The letter from Paul openly praises the Pope calling him a man of God. [TROY’S NOTE: TO VIEW THIS LETTER (” Honoring Pope John Paul II: A Consistent Pro-Life Figure”by Rep. Ron Paul, MD) GO TO: http://www.lewrockwell.com/paul/paul242.html] •Regarding to his association with Jesse Helms, by the same logic—that being, his role as a politician—I again assume for the moment that he may have had reasons for keeping the lines of communication open with Helms. Helms is a 33rd Degree Freemason which Paul never reveals. Paul has played the game in Washington for years which no honest man would do. An honest man would openly expose it all as in Mr. Smith Goes to Washington. •The gold commission-I looked up Paul & Lehrman’s Gold Commission Report of 7/1/82 and dowloaded it in .pdf format, but I don’t have the time to wade into 230+ pages just now (I’m a slow reader). From the preface and intro it seems that Dr. Paul is a staunch advocate for a gold standard, in which I find no fault, but I will hazard a guess (from my one of your lectures) and say your concern must be that he does not advocate a bi-metal standard? Is it possible he simply has overlooked the value of bi-metallism? No. I think he advocates the gold standard as a stepping stone to restoring Gold and Silver coin. But he is addressing symptoms, not the source of the disease—and he knows it. He has lectured at the Jesuit Order’s Georgetown University just two days ago. He knows the Georgetown/CFR connection yet remains mute. •I visit Lew Rockwell’s site occasionally, and have not noted anything in the articles there that struck me as questionable… Could you give me an example of “disinfo” to help sharpen perceptions of this guy? Rockwell addresses symptoms also. Never does he address the power of the Vatican in political affairs, past or present. This should be common knowledge to any legitimate investigative journalist. •Could Ron Paul have been in the Reagan administration for benign reasons? perhaps for a belief that it’s better to work from the inside? Never. Reagan was surrounded by Knights of Malta in his administration. Paul was there when Reagan acknowleged the Sovereign State of Vatican City yet never made an outcry. Paul knows the Vatican killed JFK, yet is silent on the topic. •That he knows the CFR’s role in the U.S. is no surprise; I infer nothing from his keeping quiet on this point other than what you said about his silence being a political tactic… Paul knows the CFR runs the US government. He also knows that 911 was an inside job. He also knows that CFR/Grover Newt Gingrich has said that anybody who believes that 911 was an inside job is “out of their mind.” This would put Paul in the hot seat—a place he does not wish to go. •I see why you characterize him as a “political thermostat.” Perhaps, as Rense suggested recently, he has a more ominous role as a “bird-dog,” sent to draw out loyal supporters of the constitution? Remembering that Rense is another Jesuit Temporal Coadjutor, no doubt that the Paul campaign is an outing of real patriots so they can be identified for the coming roundups for the concentration camps now admitted to exist by the San Francisco Chronicle. To all these points I would add: •A short YouTube clip shows Dr. Paul just as he is about to step into a limo. Someone calls to him from off-camera; he glances up and quickly flashes that 1st and 4th finger “horns” salute the NWO types use. Now, it’s hard to imagine that if he’s a NWO stealth candidate that he would ever allow himself to be caught by such a careless breach… so might he have been reacting impulsively and without knowing the meaning of that gesture? [TROY’S NOTE: SEE http://troyspace.wordpress.com/2008/02/08/ron-paul-the-horned-hand/ (”Ron Paul & “the Horned Hand”") & http://spirituallysmart.com/ron_paul.html (”Ron Paul, J.B.S., Catholicism, Reagan”) FOR MORE INCRIMINATING EVIDENCE ON RON PAUL] He was sending a message, I’m sure. If Paul was really an enemy of the Order’s CFR controlled US government, he would have received the Paul Wellstone or Larry McDonald treatment years ago. •Less ambiguously and more ominously, his official website, RonPaul2008.com, recently announced Dr. Paul sponsors new legislation, of which he says: “My legislation, entitled The Marque and Reprisal Act of 2007 (HR 3216), makes the surgical strike option available to the President in our mission to capture Bin Laden… it is high time ALL constitutional tools were utilized in the hunt for this dangerous madman…” Does this not expose Paul for the fake that he is? •I do find this very troubling: (1) He has been proclaimed from the start that we need to disengage from our many foreign “entanglements” in line with the view of our founding Fathers, yet now he egregiously contradicts himself. And by this new measure he gives an already out of control Executive still more power to “ramp-up” hostilities in the Middle East. Wouldn’t Pike be pleased? By his statement quoted above, Paul believes that 911 was done by Bin Laden; that Bin Laden is still alive and not dead; and that this Crusade is justified which includes approval of surgical strikes in Iraq and Afghanistan. Further, Paul is repeating the mantra of the pope’s preachers of this ungodly Crusade against the Shia. (2) His act gives tacit approval to the War on Terror mythology, and underscored his position by denouncing the idea that 9/11 truth could be anything but the official version. Agreed. (3) Shortly before her recent assassination in Pakistan, Benazir Bhutto sat for an interview with David Frost—BBC I think. Correct. While engaged in an unrelated line of thought, she casually mentioned an operation in which a certain man had taken part; then, (quite innocently I thought) she noted that same man was the one who had killed Bin Laden in late 2001 or early 2002 (can’t recall). I think it’s on YouTube. Agreed. Bin Laden has been dead for years. Even Ann Coulter admits to this fact. •Then there’s this: In several of his speeches and debates, while decrying the folly of our Iraq entanglement, Dr. Paul has noted pointedly, and with no apparent reason given the context, that we are building an embassy in Baghdad that’s “bigger than the Vatican.” That seemed calculated to go over the heads of all but the most informed… But to whom? And what purpose? Good question. He appeared to be anti-Vatican at that moment. This was a calculated deception and gained popularity among the anti-Vatican backers. Paul is playing politics as he has done for the last twenty years. For the moment, anyway, I can’t perceive a “smoking gun” yet that would fully discredit him. To me he seems an enigma. I’m reluctant to form any judgments just yet. It seems he’s either very evil, or remarkably shrewd. He is both. No honest man is an enigma. Transparency is the key to dectecting a man’s honesty—who he really is. The honest man tells the same story every time he opens his mouth no matter where he is. Any further insight you might offer would be greatly appreciated, because if he turns out to be bad, then for whom does one vote? I vote for no one on a federal level. I participate in State government and State issues. I advocate State secession and the resumption of sovereignty for the once Great Protestant Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. Secession is the only political answer. _________________________________________________ Meanwhile, I’ve been trying to gain a better grasp on another matter: My earlier question about your VA III e-book was inspired by the idea that most of the 500,000+ Ron Paul supporters, and all others, for that matter, need to better understand what’s really going on. Agreed. They know nothing and are being used to further the fascist agenda. Notice that most of the Paul supporters are White, and will man the pope’s White fascist DHS and Blackwater once the next terrorist event occurs. My contact with many of them via the DailyPaul.com web-log suggests their enthusiasm is genuine, their will to give and sacrifice is real, but they are still in may ways, child-like. Any statement, any question you may ask better resonate with their “rah rah rah, go team go” camaraderie, or your are likely to be excoriated and labeled a “troll,” which I means a “subversive” or disinfo artist, near as i can tell. Agreed. They almost have a nazi mentality. This is because they are desperate and know this government cannot continue on its present course much longer. This was the same political atmosphere that brought Hitler to power after the wicked Versailles Treaty and economic collapse in 1921. All in all, it seems many of them are far from understanding. I’ve been thinking about how to call attention to your research in a way that piques interest rather than raises ire. That will be difficult, but an honest goal. [NAME REMOVED] Sincerely in faith, Brother Eric